The Broker Online

The French Connections: French aid for a new world

ANP / Guillermo Legaria
Danielle Barret is project manager in the research and strategy directorate, International Research Centre for Agricultural Development.
Henri Rouillé d’Orfeuil is coordinator of the new campus for sustainable development within the Jardin tropical de Paris.

Faced with new geopolitical and environmental challenges, the French government as well as NGOs are changing their rhetoric. A focus on European and international efforts to promote a sustainable world is replacing old slogans of development.

Alamy / Victor Watts

It should come as no surprise that France’s development assistance policies are rooted in the country’s colonial history. Since the 1960s, that history has had a strong influence on the geography of French cooperation. At first, aid was provided to the former colonies in Africa and Asia, 1 then in the 1990s to emerging economies such as Brazil, Mexico, China, Indonesia, Nigeria and South Africa, before concentrating on Africa in more recent years.

French aid to all of these countries has been combined with the new migration policy recently harmonized at the European level. Globalization and emerging issues such as food security, the environment and climate change are also gradually rearranging the geopolitical map, leading France to review its partnerships and its strategy.

Actions speak louder than words

Since the turn of the millennium, French diplomats have made their presence felt at all important international meetings and summits on development. In 2002, at the UN Conference on Financing for Development in Monterrey, France pledged to increase its official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7% of GDP by 2015. At a European summit in May 2005, France and its European partners committed to achieve ODA at 0.51% of GDP by 2010.

Also in 2005, France hosted the second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, together with the World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The subsequent ‘Paris Declaration’ calls on countries to coordinate their bilateral and multilateral aid policies in line with the priorities of the recipient countries. In September 2008, at the third High Level Forum in Accra, Ghana, France approved the Accra Declaration, which urges countries to continue to work towards achieving the goals of the Paris Declaration. President Nicolas Sarkozy reaffirmed all of these commitments at the G20 meetings in London and Pittsburgh, and the G8 meeting in Aquila in 2009.

The actual amounts of aid being provided hardly match the official claims, however. Although the percentage of GDP devoted to ODA rose steadily between 2000 and 2005, from 0.30% to 0.47% (€8446 million in 2005), 2 the actual volume of aid fell by more than 15% in 2007. Within Europe, this was the second most significant decrease, after the UK. After a slight increase in aid in 2009 (to 0.42% of GDP), the National Assembly agreed that in the 2010 budget just 0.44% of GDP (€8664 million) would be devoted to development assistance, 0.07% less than the amount promised by the European Union partners. 3

French NGOs have criticized the government’s failure to meet the European commitments of 2005, and for inflating official ODA figures by including other assistance to French overseas territories and cancelled debts, and for its lack of clarity regarding the ‘welcome fees’ paid to foreign students. According to Concord, the European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development, other EU countries are guilty of similar reporting practices, albeit to a lesser extent. Nevertheless, the French government recently reiterated that it will meet its promises by 2015.

The politics of development

The French system for international cooperation remained more or less unchanged from the 1960s to the 1980s. During the first two decades, the Ministry of International Cooperation and Development provided grants to support to the francophone African countries, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was responsible for all other former colonies in Asia and North Africa, while the Central Bank for Economic Cooperation (CCCE) 4 was in charge of disbursing loans to developing countries. Officially, these three government structures were meant to help the former colonies in the transition to development, focusing on infrastructure, agriculture, health, education and research.

In addition to the cooperation agreements, there were military agreements, 5 as well as in some cases secret additional deals concerning strategic resources (oil, gas, uranium, lithium, etc.). The close ties between some African leaders and French businessmen and political parties developed into a corrupt system, later called Francafrique6 in which the French state was at least passively complicit, which came to prevail over democratic principles.

Following the election of President François Mitterand in 1981 – the first victory for the Left since 1957 – an attempt was made to reform French international cooperation. The Ministry dedicated to Africa was dismantled, but not for long. In 1986, partly in response to the reaction of the African leaders for whom it had been a severe blow, the Ministry was reassembled, and the Francafrique network continued.

From the mid-1980s, France increasingly sought partners in the North able to share the load of supporting the development of its former colonies. Thus the proportion of multilateral aid increased while bilateral aid was reduced. 7 It gradually became clear that African countries were far worse off, with ever-growing debts, as a result of the structural adjustment policies of the Bretton Woods institutions. But by then the French government had already shifted away from giving aid only to Africa, towards also supporting emerging economies in Asia and Latin America.

Following the end of the Cold War, democratic movements were emerging in many parts of Africa. In response, in June 1990, President Mitterand announced in La Baule that aid and democracy would henceforth be linked; that the poorest African partners would receive grants rather than loans in order to put an end to the mounting debt crisis; and that the French Development Bank 8 would be authorized to give both grants and loans to other poor countries. Unfortunately, this last move created competition with the Ministry for Cooperation, and confusion in the field. At the same time, French technical assistance was severely reduced, from 23,000 people on overseas aid assignments in 1980 to just 2000 in 1998.

The late 1990s marked a renewed interest of the French government in Africa, and its commitment to the Millennium Development Goals (in 2000). But France today is torn between its claim to uphold universal principles such as human rights, its wish to maintain strong alliances with its traditional partners, its need to develop commerce, and, like so many others after 11 September 2001, its renewed concerns about terrorism. French military support abroad, sometimes to authoritarian regimes or fragile governments, was linked to old military agreements (such as that with Chad) or was intended to protect French citizens and private interests abroad or avoid violent crises (as in Côte d’Ivoire). France’s efforts to involve the African Union in resolving conflicts have been partly successful.

Towards coherence

In the past, the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) 9 criticized France’s complex government structures for aid, which did not promote policy coherence. But in 1998, the Foreign Ministry introduced reforms that were to remedy this situation. The Ministry for Cooperation disappeared and a single Directorate General for International Cooperation and Development was created within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The French Development Agency (Agence Française de Développement, AFD) was reinforced and given responsibility for implementing projects in areas such as agriculture, basic education and industry.

Coordination among the ministries concerned with development aid policy was structured through the Inter-Ministerial Committee on International Cooperation and Development (CICID), 10 which is chaired by the prime minister, and its secretariat is co-chaired by the ministries of Foreign Affairs and of Finance. In 2005, a follow-up structure was created within the CICID: the Conference on Strategic Orientation and Planning (COSP), 11 headed by the state secretary for cooperation. Between 1998 and 2009, the CICID created so-called ‘priority solidarity zones’ (ZSPs), and reduced the number of countries receiving assistance from 65 in 1999 to 55 in 2002. Among these are a group of 14 fragile and very poor countries, designated in June 2009. 12

A last organizational change followed in 2008, as part of the general reform of French public policy. 13 The AFD was given responsibility for the implementation and budgets of all development projects. At the same time, a new Directorate for Global Affairs, Development and Partnerships 14 was created within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with responsibility for defining policies and strategy, and for controlling the AFD. This new directorate answers the DAC recommendations on improved policy coherence, although its benefits and achievements remain to be seen. First impressions indicate is that there is a will, but obstacles lie ahead, such as the capacity of the AFD, as the main player for operations, to handle its huge number of projects.

No longer a welcoming country

Since 2002, and especially since 2007, the dynamics of French development assistance have been linked with a stronger immigration control policy. Indeed, new restrictions on the availability of visas have reduced the possibilities for all but the most talented migrants to settle in France. Then, in late 2007, a new Ministry for Immigration, Integration, National Identity and Co-development was created and associated with the COSP structure within CICID. At the last CICID meeting in June 2009, it was decided that countries that have signed agreements regarding migration would receive more aid. 15 Although presented as a win–win deal for all partners, this new policy has recently been criticized by migrant NGOs such as Cimade.

Hollandse Hoogte / Mehdi Chebil, Polaris – Bernard Cassen, co-founder of ATTAC and former director of Le Monde diplomatique, at the World Social Forum, January 2010.

Migration policy was one of the major themes of the French Presidency of the European Union in 2008. Wishing to prove its vigilance towards security, the French government, together with its European Union colleagues, came out in favour of a harmonization of migration policy. In October 2009, they signed the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum, which proposes five commitments on legal immigration, control of illegal immigration, effective controls at Schengen borders, European asylum, and partnerships with the migrants’ countries of origin. This pact was recently criticized in a recent UNDP report. 16

Environment and development: global goods

French NGOs like to refer to intellectuals such as René Dumont, the so-called ‘father of environment policy’, to argue that they were the first in France to warn of the battle for the planet. Even so, The ‘environment’ was not an issue in French public debate prior to the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, which linked development with concerns about public goods and the environment. But the participating countries did not deliver on their promises. Instead, spurred by accelerating globalization, the general drive has been towards liberalization of finance and economics, rather than to bridge the North–South gap in terms of development and environmental threats. The slow and incomplete ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, which entered into force in 2005, was Rio’s main achievement.

Environmental awareness took some time to emerge, but after Rio, a growing number of French NGOs took up the issue. In January 2001, the newspaper le Monde diplomatique, the social justice network ATTAC 17 and other French and Brazilian social movements decided to create a forum as a counterpoint to the World Economic Forum. Since the first World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2001, its annual meetings have become more popular, and French NGOs have become increasingly engaged in environmental issues and sustainable development in general. 18

Civil society and the cooperation system

The involvement of NGOs, migrant organizations, local governments (so-called ‘decentralized cooperation’ 19) and the private sector in development cooperation has been growing since 1980. Gradually, the links between these non-state efforts and the French administration have been formalized.

In 1984, the Commission for Cooperation and Development was created as a forum for discussion between the diverse civil society associations and the French administration. Fifteen years later, a High Council for International Cooperation (HCCI 20), composed of many stakeholders, was created to advise the government, foster debate and produce reports on cooperation issues. But the council was disbanded following the public policy reforms in 2008.

The diverse non-state actors are organized into large national alliances. Coordination SUD (Solidarité Urgence Développement) represents 130 NGOs, le Forum des Organisations de Solidarité Internationale issues des Migrations (FORIM) brings together 700 migrant groups, and Cités Unies France represents cities involved in international cooperation. These alliances also extend to the European level and beyond. Coordination SUD, for example, is an active member of Concord, the European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development, which represents 25 national NGO platforms.

These civil society actors receive little funding from the state cooperation budget. In 2005, NGOs received €95.5 million – less than 1% of ODA, compared with the European average of 7%. The French government has so far not kept its 2005 promise to double the funding for NGOs.

The French government’s environmental awareness became apparent at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002, when President Chirac noted that ‘our planet is burning and we are looking away’. A year later, Chirac asked Jean-Pierre Landau, deputy governor of the Bank of France, to head a working group to come up with innovative means of financing development. The report of the Landau group, under the auspices of the UN and supported by the heads of state of Brazil, France and Chile, led to the introduction in France of an ‘international solidarity levy’ on air tickets, the revenue from which is used to pay for drugs to treat AIDS and other diseases. Today, the Paris-based Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development is supported by more than 50 governments. 21

Climate change and the environment were major issues during the 2007 presidential campaign. Five of the candidates, including Nicolas Sarkozy, signed the Pacte écologique, launched by writer Nicolas Hulot, which stated that the environmental crisis should be a high government priority. The pact led to the organization of a national debate, the Grenelle environnement22 that brought together representatives of all groups of stakeholders under the umbrella of the new president. This political breakthrough galvanized French activism at both European and international levels in the run-up to the UN conference on climate change in Copenhagen in December 2009. 23

Central to the negotiations on climate change have been the economic costs of limiting carbon dioxide emissions and adaptation in developing countries. President Sarkozy recently responded with his ‘justice/climate action plan’, in which he proposed climate solidarity worldwide to assist the poorest countries. 24

A changing research landscape

Since the 1990s, as awareness of global issues has grown, the traditional divide in French research between development, the environment and foreign policy/security has become less marked. The themes of poverty and environment promoted by the UN, culminating in the Millennium Development Goals, called for more expertise and research at the global level. This brought about an innovative process of global governance of research (e.g. the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC). The European Union also emphasized the importance of research and research networks, resulting in the Framework Programmes FP6 25 and FP7.

In 2002, the commitments made by the French government at the UN conferences on financing for development (Monterrey) and sustainable development (Johannesburg) had consequences for national research priorities. The themes biodiversity, ecology and sustainable development were adopted by research organizations such as the new Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR, created in 2005). In 2008, a new Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) was created to bring together French partners and other stakeholders. The Institut du développement durable et des relations internationals (IDDRI, created in 2001) has played an important role in bringing together foreign policy, environment and development research. In 2007, IDDRI formed an alliance with Sciences Po Paris, France’s foremost higher education and foreign policy research centre.

Since 2005, the reforms of the research system have helped to promote networks (such as the Réseaux thématiques de recherche avancée, RTRA), centres of excellence (such as the Association Instituts Carnot) and ‘poles of research and higher education’ (PRES) to strengthen the productivity and the international visibility of French research. Performance and high quality standards are the criteria for funding from the ANR (whose research budget was €800 million in 2010) and the Agence pour l’évaluation de la recherche et de l’enseignement supérieur (AERES).

More recently, thematic alliances (life sciences, energy, etc.) have brought together researchers from diverse institutions and universities. In 2009, for instance, the new Consortium for Agriculture, Food, Animal Health and the Environment created AGREENIUM, which links top research and educational institutions, including INRA and Cirad. The latter will ensure the development orientation of the alliance. Cirad is creating a new ‘sustainable development campus’, 26 to link several research institutions (CNRS, IRD, CIRAD, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), the Groupe de recherche et d’études technologiques (GRET, a technical centre for applied development research) and various NGOs. 27

With this major transformation still in process, the keywords are alliances of institutions for better research programming, better international visibility, better quality and performance, and exploration of new research themes at the interfaces of different fields of science, and increasingly focusing on global issues. The new national strategy for research and innovation, presented in July 2009, 28 focuses on three domains: health/food/biotech, environment and eco-technologies, and ICTs/nanotechnologies. Its impact should become apparent over the next decade.

French research institutions

Development

  • Dedicated organizations: Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (Cirad: www.cirad.fr); Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD : www.ird.fr)
  • Social sciences and humanities: EHESS (Ecole d’économie de Paris, Centre d’études africaines.), Paris I (Iedes, Gemdev), Paris X (Economix), CNRS (SEDET), Bordeaux (CEAN)
  • Think-tanks: FARM Foundation (www.fondation-farm.org)
  • Applied research: Groupe de recherche et d’études technologiques (GRET: www.gret.org)

Environment

  • Public research institutes: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS : www.cnrs.fr), (Institut national de la recherche agronomique (Inra : www.inra.fr), Cemagref (www.cemagref.fr), Cirad
  • Universities: EPHE – Sciences de la vie et de la terre ; Université de Paris Est : LEESU (Laboratoire eau, environnement et systèmes urbains ; Université de Montpellier II.
  • Mixed research units: CEPED (www.ceped.org), CIRED (www.centre-cired.fr), LSCE (www.lsce.ipsl.fr), Carnot CED2 Chimie, Environnement et Développement Durable (View PDF), Carnot VITRES (VITRES), R2DS ; Réseau de recherche sur le développement soutenable (www.r2ds.centre-cired.fr/)
  • Think-tanks: IDDRI (www.iddri.org)

Foreign policy/security

  • Universities: Sciences-Po/Paris: CERI (www.ceri-sciencespo.com) Paris II: IHEI
  • Think-tanks: IFRI (www.ifri.org), IRIS (www.iris-france.org), Centre Thucidide (www.afri-ct.org)
  • Ministries and research centres: Premier Ministre CAS (www.strategie.gouv.fr), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Centre d’analyses et de prévisions)

Performance and quality
Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR): www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr 
Agence pour l’évaluation de la recherche et de l’enseignement supérieur (AERES): www.aeres-evaluation.fr 
L’Observatoire des sciences et des techniques (OST): www.obs-ost.fr

The waiting game

The new concepts of globalization and global public good have challenged earlier distinctions between developed and developing countries, as well as the nature of development assistance. A new vision of international solidarity is needed. In June 2009, the French government announced that its cooperation policy would focus on achieving the 2015 ODA objective; implementing the commitments made at the G20 meeting in London in April 2009; improving the focus of aid and coordination with other donors; looking at innovative financing for development; and linking up civil society action to government efforts. 29 In fact, it was as a result of the dialogue between the state and civil society early this century, reinforced by the Grenelle environnement in 2008, that development and the environment have become an important, joined-up issue in France.

If, thanks to its internal policies, France is finding a new legitimacy on environmental issues at the international level, there is no evidence that future global negotiations will favour France, or Europe, or the developing countries. Indeed, the financial consequences of environmental regulation in developing countries – particularly in the poorest countries – are a key issue. Copenhagen was unsuccessful on this point, disappointing both developing countries and NGOs.

Faced with the never-ending waiting game of countries which are, at the end of the day, primarily interested in defending their short-term national interests, the question is: will French civil society stakeholders go further in their plans for regional and global governance of NGOs in order to achieve deeper and fairer cooperation? Recent opinion polls indicate that French citizens are still willing to give money and support to assistance programmes for developing countries, despite the economic downturn.

Besides the official state cooperation, whose words and actions can sometimes conflict, a new design seems to be needed for new authorities bringing together authorized representatives, if citizens are to play a more active role in helping to solve major global problems.

Footnotes

  1. The former French colonies in Africa are: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Comoros, Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon, DR Congo, Gabon, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Senegal Togo and Tunisia; and in Asia, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.
  2. Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs (2007) Mémorandum de la France sur ses politiques et programmes en matière d’aide publique au développement. Ministère des affaires étrangères et européennes, December.
  3. Anne Denis (2009) L’aide au développement pâtit de la crise, Les Echos, November.
  4. Caisse Centrale de Coopération Economique (CCCE).
  5. For example, the accords signed with Côte d’Ivoire, Benin and Niger, 24 April 1961.
  6. François-Xavier Verschave (1999) La Françafrique. Stock.
  7. Claude Freud (2009) De la coopération française à la banque mondiale : Mémoires du développement. Karthala.
  8. Caisse Française de Développement (CFD), the former CCCE.
  9. OECD-DAC (2009) OECD Journal on Development: Cooperation for Development Report 2009. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.http://www.oecd.org/dac/dcr
  10. Comité Interministériel de la Coopération Internationale et du Développement (CICID):http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/aide-au-developpement_1060/politique-francaise_3024/dispositif-institutionnel_5155/cicid_5171/index.html
  11. Conférence d’Orientation Stratégique et de Programmation (COSP):http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/aide-au-developpement_1060/politique-francaise_3024/priorites-strategiques_5156/les-documents-orientation-strategique_15540/conference-orientation-strategique-programmation_57658.html
  12. Henriette Martinez (2009) L’aide publique au développement française : analyses des contributions multilatérales, réflexions et propositions pour une plus grande efficacité, Rapport remis au Premier ministre et au Secrétaire d’Etat à la coopération et à la francophonie, 31 juillet 2009.
  13. La révision générale des politiques publiques (RGPP):http://www.rgpp.modernisation.gouv.fr/
  14. The Direction Générale de la Mondialisation, du Développement et des Partenariats has five divisions: global economy and development strategy, global public goods, cultural policy, mobility and attractiveness policies, programmes and the French cooperation network.
  15. ‘Les pays ayant conclu un accord de gestion concertée des flux migratoires pourront bénéficier d’un traitement préférentiel en matière d’APD’.http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/aide-au-developpement_1060/institutions_19758/dispositif-institutionnel-francais_19759/cicid-juin-2009_74507.html
  16. Grégoire Allix (2009) L’Europe s’accepte mal comme terre d’immigration, Le Monde, 6 October.
  17. The Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens (ATTAC) was founded in France in 1998. http://www.attac.org
  18. Henri Rouillé d’Orfeuil (2006) La diplomatie non gouvernementale : Les ONG peuvent-elles changer le monde? Editions de l’Atelier.
  19. Under 1992 legislation, French local governments can enter into agreements with foreign local governments for assistance or humanitarian actions. Representatives gather each year at a meeting chaired by the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
  20. Haut Conseil de la Coopération Internationale (HCCI).
  21. Originally called the Leading Group on Solidarity Levies to Fund Development, but recently renamed the Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development.http://www.leadinggroup.org
  22. Le Grenelle environnement: http://www.legrenelle-environnement.fr
  23. Sylvestre Huet (2009) L’UE au rendez-vous du protocole de Kyoto. Libération, 14–15 November.
  24. ‘N. Sarkozy pleads for a justice/climate action plan’. Reuters, 27 November 2009.
  25. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/whatisfp6.htm
  26. Located in the Tropical Garden of Paris, Nogent.
  27. NGOs such as Agronomes et vétérinaires sans frontières (AVSF) and Améliorer la gouvernance de la terre de l’eau et des ressources foncières (AGTER).
  28. La stratégie nationale de recherche et d’innovation: http://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/pid20797/strategie-nationale-de-la-recherche-et-de-l-innovation.html
  29. The five areas that will receive most attention are health, education, agriculture, growth and sustainable development.

 

 
Authors: Danielle Barret, Henri Rouillé d’Orfeuil

About the authors

Danielle Barret is project manager in the research and strategy directorate, International Research Centre for Agricultural Development.

Henri Rouillé d’Orfeuil is coordinator of the new campus for sustainable development within the Jardin tropical de Paris.

Want to know more?
Get in touch with us
Contact